A Question of Social Justice - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 9 Words: 2676 Downloads: 7 Date added: 2019/04/08 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Social Justice Essay Did you like this example? Only thing we have to fear is fear itself FDR in his inaugural speech in March 1933 was alerting the nation that fear was making things worse. Fear is such an incredible force, it has the power to bring people to their knees, paralyze some from moving at all, and make people run for safety due to some perceived threat to their well-being or way of life. Such is the power of fear that it can make grown men and women cower and seek to create borders around all that they hold dear. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "A Question of Social Justice" essay for you Create order Unfortunately, this can especially be damaging when those who profess to have a relationship with Jesus Christ use fear as a means to justify violations of justice or to attack others within the Christian community. Fear often can pit us against those we profess to love. Fear can take normally rational people into the abyss of anxiety and make them utilize weapons they would generally not in order to avoid changing, to maintain comfort, and often makes situations worse by creating unneeded/unwarranted conflict. It is in a stance of fear where Evangelical Christians find themselves with the topic of social justice. So much so that as recent as September 2018 a group of prominent Evangelical Christian men authored and published a statement https://statementonsocialjustice.com/ in order to take a stand against the evil of social justice. These men believe that social justice is corrupting the Gospel of Christ and is an attack on His church. They felt so passionate about this new obsession a growing number of believers have and how much of threat it is to the church/gospel that they issued a 14 point statement to debunk it. As one of the writers, Tom Ascol, wrote in a September 4, 2018 blog post; we determined to make a public stand together in hopes of warning about the dangers we see in some of what is being promoted in the name of social justice. This public stand comes at an interesting time in our history not only do we currently have a nationalistic, racist, and xenophobic president (he who must not be named) that was overwhelmingly voted for and continues to be supported by White evangelical Christians (80%), the rise of hate crimes and police brutality against people of color is rising at alarming numbers . Not to mention that The Gospel Coalition held a huge MLK 50 celebration/conference where many evangelicals called out the church for supporting white supremacy and ignoring issues of race the month before the statement was released. For these men the time seemed ripe for a broad sweeping indictment against social justice. A combination of what seems like righteous indignation and overwhelming fear that Christians were being led away from fundamental Christianity that is overwhelmingly based on White theology. The fear of socialism is pretty evident throughout the statement. Socialism in the sense that equality is far more important than be united in Christ. That political socialism is creeping into the church and the language being used by many Christians doing justice work is creating attacks on the oneness of the church and making believers turn from God to humanism. There is also a rise among many evangelicals who are questioning issues of race especially in stances of police brutality, which I believe can traced back to the killing of Mike Brown and Ferguson. The statement reads like a cautionary tale where the church needs to be protected or else things will fall apart and the church will fall victim to secular culture. When describing what this final project was all about, this declaration stuck out to me Write about what pisses you off it made me laugh and exclaim; there isnt enough paper in the world for me to write about what pisses me off. Snark is a gift and it should never go to waste. As this assignments deadline looms, I found that the thing that has been pissing me off the most lately and most especially this first semester of grad school is evangelical Christianity and its unwillingness to come together over issues of justice, mercy and grace. Over the past two years my place of employment has come under attack for creating spaces to talk about injustice, racism, and sexism. Many were accused (myself included) of making issues where none exist. Some individuals were completely roasted online by colleagues and students for creating divisions by calling out injustice and race issues. One would think at a Christian higher education institution that these issues would be welcomed and openly e ngaged unfortunately no. The situation is so out of hand that using the term social justice is equivalent to swearing on the campus. Some staff and faculty are so adamant that social justice is not a gospel issue that they openly bad mouth others who advocate for it. The board even got involved at one point and ultimately decided to axe our president for his diversity stances. There is also the situation of my former church which I mentioned in my race workshop paper and how it was the impetus for me leaving that church. I have been wounded and deeply traumatized by the negative reactions to social justice, race, equality, and feminism so that when the statement was released on September 5, I was not at all surprised but deeply grieved. The statement made me revisit all the hurt/anger of the past two years in a fresh way it was raw and ugly. Im utterly disgusted and deeply saddened by this statement as it fails to acknowledge that many devout/sincere followers of Christ see justice work as an outpouring of l ove. The love so freely given by God and his redemptive work. Many understand the commands to love God and love people as not only a model for life but a mandate to work for justice. So, that is why the statement pisses me off, as to why it is a justice issue this statement is a direct violation of the principles of Human Dignity, The Common Good, Solidarity (virtue and principle) and it is based on a reductionist view of Gospel. Within Christianity, statements like this are nothing new throughout history, Christians have come together to scrutinize and respond to perceived threats to the faith. These are designed to address cultural shifts, societal pressures on the church, and answer scripturally to these so called threats. Many are well intentioned and address real issues, though not all hit the mark correctly as they will create divisions that are not entirely necessary. They can also be distractions, the energy and time used to craft such statements could be used elsewhere in helping the poor, the disenfranchised, victims of hate crimes, fighting systemic injustices, or simply creating healthy/loving communities. This statement presents a truncated Gospel, one that reduces the Gospel to just salvation. It does not take into account the words and actions of Jesus in the New Testament. It reduces the work of Christ to just being the means of reconciliation with God, the eraser of sins (personal sins) it does not take into account that Jesus came to bring about the Kingdom of God. In the book of Mark, Jesus preaches about the kingdom of God, which is really the good news. In the book of Luke (4:18-19) , Jesus makes this proclamation: The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to set the oppressed free, to proclaim the year of the Lords favor. Jesus went to synagogues where ever he travel to preach this message, which often was not well received by the Jewish leaders of the day. This is the true richness of the Gospel and like many in Jesus day, we want to change the message and perhaps kill the messenger. Jesus message is not just a way to receive salvation, it is a way to live life. Thinking through this statement, it seems to me that the authors of this statement are modern day Pharisees. Perhaps that is too harsh a criticism of these men and their intentions or maybe it is not harsh enough. Jesus even warns the Pharisees of his day in Matthew 23:23 Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You give a tenth of your spices mint, dill and cumin. But you have neglected the more important matters of the law justice, mercy and faithfulness. You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former. This statement was not only written exclusively by men, but they are also all white men there is no inclusion of Christians of color or women (its like we dont matter). Not only does it uphold the patriarchy of our day, it is fairly racist in its terminology by trying to uphold the standards of white supremacy (read culture affirmation) and it is political in tone though the authors try to deny this. The statement also reeks of privilege as Tom Ascol puts it, On June 19 of this year I had the privilege of meeting in the iconic Herbs House coffee sh op in Dallas with 13 other men to discuss our common concerns about some teachings and practices being advocated in the name of social justice. We had never been in a room together but all accepted the invitation of Josh Buice, who was aware that we had similar perspectives on this growing movement . All of these had never been in a room together but knew enough about the threat to their comfort, privilege, and supremacy they could craft such a statement. At first read of this statement, I thought to myself, just ignore it but at this time there are over 10,000 signatures on it and that just gnaws at my soul. There was a slight arrogance in me that wanted to rip it up theologically point by point but after much thought, that didnt seem like the wisest use of my time or yours. Plus, I do not wholly disagree with all the affirmations in this statement. There is some good stuff in there that I can get fully back like the affirmations in Imago Dei, Scripture, Justice, and Salvation sections though we deny areas are not something I can support. This statement takes much for granted, for instance no terms are defined not even social justice. The authors throw words like intersectionality, radical feminism, critical race theory, privilege, relativism, authentic justice, and even heresy without taking the time to define what those words mean. They just assume everyone who reads this will understand what they are saying but those words are loaded with meaning and are used differently by Christians and non-Christians. It astonishes me that educated people even signed this document before asking questions about the meaning behind what they authors intended. The very thing they are trying to protect the church from, is not even remotely defined in the statement. From that perspective this is a weak stance to take and perhaps they should have taken more time to craft their proclamation. What is dangerous in this statement is the supposition that getting the right doctrine, will then set everything else straight. That if you affirm that racism, misogyny, classism, and injustice are sins against God and the oneness of the church, then there wont be problems these things will somehow magically disappear. It takes for granted the process of sanctification, the fact that we are humans prone to mistakes, free will, and ego/pride. Simply because you believe wholly in the redemptive work of Christ and your identity is in Him, does not automatically mean one wont be racist, sexist, classist, and will be completely motivated to do justice. One just need look to the Apostle Peter and know that having a relationship with Jesus does not erase the issues we struggle with, the biases we have, and the pride within us. Not only did this man walk with Jesus, serve with Him, and have access to Him, Peter was also a hot head, a liar, and a racist. The scripture recounts many times wher e Peter messed up from the time he tried to tell Jesus he wasnt going to die, to cutting off a mans ear, denying he knew Jesus (three times) and then to being rebuked by Apostle Paul for treating Jews above gentiles. Perhaps an unintended consequence of this statement is that one could read it, agree with it, sign it and go on their merry way. It does nothing to motivate those that agree with it do to change anything about how they live. The status quo can remain, you can believe in Jesus, the Scriptures, and in the church but do nothing for the poor, abstain from changing/dismantling systemic evil, and criticize those who do justice work. Christians throughout history have been well intentioned, loved Jesus, and wanted to live their lives for God but didnt do anything to stop slavery, genocide, wanted to stop the suffrage movement, upheld Jim Crow laws, and wanted nothing to do with the civil rights movement. It seems that all of these people would have been fine signing this statement since one can still be a part of the church and change nothing no rocking the boat here. Interestingly the statement is written in a creedal way, it wishes to mimic the tone of creeds like Nicene and Apostles by its affirmations. Leaves one to wonder who gave them this authority and by what right can they issue such a statement. As far as I know, they are not church fathers, just prominent pastors within a small section of evangelical circles. This is where I think a significant injustice is occurring to the principle of common good. The breaking apart of community, the intentional splitting of Christian fellowship, and creating a society of division and impeding people from making conditions better in social life for common community. It utterly destroys the oneness of Christ they are so desperately trying to preserve for the evangelical Christian community. Many earnest Christians truly believe that social justice is imperative to a life of faith that Social justice is about turning things the right way up the way that God intended. It is God who demands justice in a w orld where injustice is rife. Solidarity comes under attack in this statement via many of the affirmations, particularly the ones on Sexuality/Marriage, Complementarianism, Race/Ethnicity, Culture, and Racism. There is division created in the ways these affirmations are worded and what the denials state. Race issues come under great attack and makes it easy for people to not stand with brown/black brothers and sisters who face discrimination, prejudice, hate crimes, and racism. It puts a great deal of onus on people of color to just forgive and get over it. Attacking social justice the way the document does sends a very clear message that they only identity that matters is the identity in Christ. That to take a stand for people of color in name of justice is to create problems where none exist. Jemar Tisby puts it this way, While Christians from many traditions, races and ethnicities have displayed a concern for social justice, it is a topic that particularly concerns black and brown folks. We have endured a long history of race-based discrimination that did not simply disappear after the March on Washington, the passage of the Civil Rights Act or the election of the nations first black president. Statements that dismiss social justice send a message that the ongoing marginalization many minorities still experience and struggle against is of no concern to their fellow Christians. Or to God. Or to the Bible. The family of God cannot stand united in solidarity with the continued marginalization of people of color. How can we serve the oppressed, stand with those in poverty, or act for the good of everyone when we cannot acknowledge the experiences of people of color?

Should Marijuana Be Legalized - 1377 Words

The Fight to Get High For years, the fight over legalizing marijuana has always been on every state’s agenda. However, marijuana continues to stir a lot of debate as to whether or not there are benefits from its use. Some refer to marijuana as a hard drug such as cocaine or heroin, especially since it is still classified as a Schedule I substance under federal law. Nevertheless, many Americans point out the medicinal benefits of the herb from several decades of research and studies. Meanwhile, with states such as Colorado and Washington already legalizing recreational marijuana, other states are starting to consider the pros of passing laws that would allow recreational use. As the legalization of marijuana continues to become a vote on ballots across the country, states, and counties; many Americans are concerned about the negative consequences this reform will have on the American youth rather than focusing on the medicinal benefits to an ill individual’s relief. When it comes to the medicinal use of marijuana, groups who oppose its legalization reply by saying that there is nothing positive someone could get from it because it is just a drug. Meanwhile, decades of studies on medical marijuana have proven there are benefits from its use on ill patients. In the article â€Å"High Times† written by Laura Sanders, she describes both the positives and negatives of marijuana use on a person’s health. In regards to medicinal use, she states,† Marijuana as a medicine is gatheringShow MoreRelatedShould Marijuana Be Legalized?849 Words   |  4 Pageswhether marijuana should be legalized. Around 23 states have legalized marijuana for medical and recreational use. In the state of Illinois, medicinal use of marijuana has been passed on April 17, 2013. Since January 2014, patients are able to obtain marijuana with a doctor s recommendation. The new debate is whether marijuana should be legalized for the general public as a recreational drug. Although some believe that marijuana is harmless, and that it has beneficial medicinal uses, marijuana shouldRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1715 Words   |  7 PagesMarijuana in Society Cannabis, formally known as marijuana is a drug obtained from the tops, stems and leaves of the hemp plant cannabis. The drug is one of the most commonly used drugs in the world. Only substances like caffeine, nicotine and alcohol are used more (â€Å"Marijuana† 1). In the U. S. where some use it to feel â€Å"high† or get an escape from reality. The drug is referred to in many ways; weed, grass, pot, and or reefer are some common names used to describe the drug (â€Å"Marijuana† 1). Like mostRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1489 Words   |  6 Pagescannabis plant or marijuana is intended for use of a psychoactive drug or medicine. It is used for recreational or medical uses. In some religions, marijuana is predominantly used for spiritual purposes. Cannabis is indigenous to central and south Asia. Cannabis has been scientifically proven that you can not die from smoking marijuana. Marijuana should be legalized to help people with medical benefits, econo mic benefits, and criminal benefits. In eight states, marijuana was legalized for recreationalRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1245 Words   |  5 PagesMarijuana is a highly debatable topic that is rapidly gaining attention in society today.   Legalizing marijuana can benefit the economy of this nation through the creation of jobs, increased tax revenue, and a decrease in taxpayer money spent on law enforcement.   Ã‚  Many people would outlaw alcohol, cigarettes, fast food, gambling, and tanning beds because of the harmful effects they have on members of a society, but this is the United States of America; the land of the free and we should give peopleRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1010 Words   |  5 PagesThe legalization of marijuana became a heated political subject in the last few years. Twenty-one states in America have legalized medical marijuana. Colorado and Washington are the only states where marijuana can be purchased recreationally. Marijuana is the high THC level part of the cannabis plant, which gives users the â€Å"high† feeling. There is ample evidence that supports the argument that marijuana is beneficial. The government should legalize marijuana recreationally for three main reasonsRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1231 Words   |  5 Pagesshows the positive benefits of marijuana, it remains illegal under federal law. In recent years, numerous states have defied federal law and legalized marijuana for both recreational and medicinal use. Arizona has legalized marijuana for medical use, but it still remains illegal to use recreationally. This is absurd, as the evidence gathered over the last few decades strongly supports the notion that it is safer than alcohol, a widely available substance. Marijuana being listed as a Schedule I drugRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1350 Words   |  6 Pagespolitics in the past decade would have to be the legalization of marijuana. The sale and production of marijuana have been legalized for medicinal uses in over twenty states and has been legalized for recreational uses in seven states. Despite the ongoing support for marijuana, it has yet to be fully legalized in the federal level due to cultural bias against â€Å"pot† smoking and the focus over its negative effects. However, legalizing marijuana has been proven to decrease the rate of incrimination in AmericaRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized? Essay1457 Words   |  6 PagesSHOULD MARIJUANA BE LEGALIZED? Marijuana is a drug that has sparked much controversy over the past decade as to whether or not it should be legalized. People once thought of marijuana as a bad, mind-altering drug which changes a person’s personality which can lead to crime and violence through selling and buying it. In the past, the majority of citizens believed that marijuana is a harmful drug that should be kept off the market and out of the hands of the public. However, a recent study conductedRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1145 Words   |  5 PagesLegalizing Marijuana Marijuana is a drug that has been actively used for centuries. This drug can be traced back to 2737 BC by the Chinese emperor Shen Nung. He spoke about the euphoric effects of Cannabis and even referred to it as the â€Å"Liberator of Sin.† Since early on, marijuana was seen as a medicinal plant that was recommended for medical uses. Marijuana is currently in schedule I, which means that physicians are not allowed to prescribe it in the United States (Hart, Ksir 2013). This drugRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1596 Words   |  7 Pages But what needs to be known before a user can safely and completely make the decision if trying Marijuana is a good idea? Many do not want the drug to be legalized because they claim that Cannabis is a â€Å"gateway drug†, meaning it will cause people to try harder drugs once their body builds up a resistance to Marijuana, because a stronger drug will be needed to reach a high state. This argument is often falsely related to the m edical side of the debate over legalization. It is claimed that this would

Cases on Acute Coronary Syndrome Sample for Students-Myassignment

Question: Discuss the Published Evidence in regard to Oxygen Therapy of the Compromised Myocardium. Would you Change or Maintain the Oxygen Administration Therapy Reported in both Mr Hertz and Mika's Management? Explain. Answer: Acute coronary syndrome Acute coronary syndrome compromises myocardium, a common cause of death in US and Europe. Myocardial infarction (heart attack) and unstable angina are its constituents resulting from sudden reduction in blood (oxygen) supply to the cardiac muscles. This reduction is as a result of formation of blood clots when an atheroma ruptures within a coronary artery. The time length blood flow is blocked, the location of the blockage and the damage that occurs on the tissue determines the type of acute coronary syndrome. Compromised myocardium in acute coronary syndrome ACS: In many cases it is as a result of narrowing of the blood vessels due to atheroma within the artery lining. Atheroma is plaques or fatty patches. They form over years; each atheroma has an outer film of soft inner fatty core. When they rupture they cause a thrombus formation, platelets activation and adherence and activation of the coagulation cascade. Other uncommon causes of ANS includes: inflammation of the coronary artery, a heart stab wound, a blood clot that travels and was formed from other parts of the body to the coronary artery, cocaine use usually causes coronary artery spasm, complications of heart surgery. Predisposition factors to acute coronary syndrome are: Hypertensive persons, overweight persons, and people with a high cholesterol, inactive persons, and unhealthy diets, diabetic. Symptoms of compromised myocardium: severe chest pain is the most common. Feels like a heavy pressure on the chest. The pain at times travels up to the jaws and down to the left arm or at times to both arms.it is similar to stable angina but lasts longer and more severe. It can last for 15 minutes to hours. Sweating, fainting, feeling sick and shortness of breath are common too. In some people especially the old and elderly and diabetic they may not have pain. The following tests are usually done: electrocardiogram, blood test and echocardiogram. An electrocardiograph (ECG) has typical changes, in some its normal. Blood tests measure of chemical troponin; it is a test of heart muscle damage. Its level rises in heart attack but not in unstable angina. Echocardiogram is an ultrasound of the heart to show the blockage or the infarction. Oxygen therapy is one of the treatment modes to these patients. As mentioned earlier, all the symptoms are as a result of reduced/no oxygen supply to cardiac muscles. On inhalation oxygen is drawn into the lungs where it dissolves in plasma and binds to hemoglobin. This oxygen is delivered to all cells for respiration (energy production) oxygen combines with glucose to give us ATP and carbon dioxide. In hypoxia there is anaerobic respiration where by glucose breaks down to lactic acid and ATP is generated. Lactic acid causes pain to the muscles s it irritates the nerves. Lactic accumulation leads to acidosis which is fatal to cells. To avoid this, these patients are supplemented with oxygen. Oxygen stress refers to the production of reactive oxygen species. These species interact with the cell contents and bring about physiological alteration. Some may react with the cell membrane contents thereby compromising its function. Some may react with the genetic material and hence destroying the nucleus. These cases have been associated with oxygen intoxication. This condition has been associated with diseases that bring about degeneration in some organs due to destruction of cells. Patient A According to the case scenario, the following can be deduced as the Patient presentation: Responsive to the environment, respiratory rate 26 breathes per minutes. This is quite high and can be considered abnormal.82 beats/minute, warm to touch, capillary refill of 2 seconds, nauseated, alert, blood pressure 105/89 ,saturation pressure of oxygen 99%,temperatures 36.8 C, crushing central chest pain ,ECG 2 results ST segment elevation,T wave inversion, flat T wave, on blood test troponin is elevated ,creatinine kinase is elevated, In this case, the risk factors are: ischemic heart disease, an ex-smoker, Hypercholesterolemia Pain assessment Crushing central chest pain exceeding 40 minutes, it is relieved and after 24 hours the pain recurs and he complains of the pain being as severe as the previous. Treatment Routine blood tests Aspirin 300mg Clopidogrel 600mg Heparin 4000 units IV bolus Simvastatin Metoprolol Perindopril GTN Reopro (abcimab): in situ 42mls per hour for 12 hours. 2 bare metal stents on the left anterior descending artery. Oxygen therapy via face mask at 6litres per minute Owing to the oxygen therapy being used as an intervention, the question of whether this is necessary arises. Considering the benefits and the demerits, a choice has to be made. Mony. S., Dan. A., Philippe.G, (2016) European Heart Journal, All patients who presents with acute coronary syndrome they are treated with oxygen supplementation regardless of the saturation levels. Hypoxemic patients highly appreciate this as it increases the delivery of oxygen to cells and reverse hypoxia effects. On the other hand it can be hazardous. Most of the acute coronary syndrome is not hypoxemic and the value of oxygen therapy is unknown. The 2014 American (AHA/ACC) ST-elevation myocardial infarction guideline recommends admission of oxygen to patients who are hypoxemic with a saturation pressure less than 90% and also to all patients admitted for the first 6 hours. The current European NSTEMI-ACS guidelines advocates for oxygen supplementation when the saturation is less than 90% ,the European STEMI-ACS guidelines recommends oxygen supplementation at less than 95% oxygen saturation. Preclinical Oxygen therapy increases dissolved plasma oxygen which cannot be monitored and most significantly the effects of these high levels. This therapy increases the delivery of oxygen to tissues. This can also be lead to formation of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) which in turns causes oxidative stress. ROS molecules formed during oxygen metabolism, causes damage to cells. Post ischemic injury which triggers inflammation as a result of leucocytes chemotaxis, they damage electron transport in the mitochondrion all this leads to cell death.in vascular smooth muscle cells, cardiac myocytes, myocytes ROS molecules causes enhanced tone as they lead to increased production of angiotensin 1 all this are associated to these reactive molecules in ischemia .they have also been associated lethal types of arrhythmia: ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. These effects are lethal and despite these there has not been proven antioxidant. Clinical Hyperbaric oxygen insufflation: there were two clinical trials which treated there patients with intermittent inhalation of 100% oxygen at atmospheric pressures more than one, this was aimed at elevating plasma concentration of dissolved oxygen. In the first study 74 MI patients were enrolled and the results was end systolic volume index reduced by 20.0% cardiac output increased by 10.0%.the second study was HOT study.121 patients with MI were chosen and it demonstrated a shorter pain relief there was no change in cardiac markers, diastolic and stiffness in the left ventricular were unaffected by oxygen therapy. Hyperemic reperfusion therapy: a multicenter AMIHOT trial: 20 patients in oxygen and 22 patients as control. The results were the left ventricular volume remained the same and in oxygen group EF increased significantly, no changes in the control group. Other parameters were unchanged. Hemodynamic effects in oxygen therapy: studies have been done and proven oxygen therapy being non beneficial. It was done on volunteers and it showed a decline of left ventricular perfusion by 23%, cardiac output CO by 10% due to decreased heart rate, stroke volume remains unchanged. Coronary artery disease patients increased production of lactate was noted probably due to reduced coronary flow. Coronary vasculature and oxygen therapy: studies have shown that coronary sinus blood flow in both normal patients and coronary artery diseases patients decreased on oxygen therapy. This is attributed to increased left ventricular coronary resistance which leads to vascular tone. These vasoconstrictor effects are hazardous especially to patients who undergo coronary stenting as there is underestimation of the coronary stents which causes sudden cardiac death and thrombosis. Random controlled clinical trials: first study by Rawles and Kenmure ,second study by Wilson and channer and last study by UKholkin they all enrolled patients with myocardial infarction and the results showered the negative effects of oxygen therapy outweighs its benefit. Management of Mr. Herz condition. From all the above its so clear oxygen therapy will do more harm than good to our patient so it has to be minimized and avoided where necessary. However, admission of oxygen for the first six hours was necessary just as stipulated by European NSTEM-ACS guidelines. Patient B Presentations Twenty breaths per minute: accompanied by signs of shortness of breath. Circulation: blood pressure 122/52mmHg, well perfused, capillary return is 2 sec, Temperature 37.2C, responsive to environment There is normal chest movement, no murmurs, no jugular distension. Tests done A normal chest x ray. Anteroseptal left ventricular wall from the ape, depressed left systolic function with hypokinesis of the anterior shown by a transthoracic echocardiography. Treatment No oxygen, pain relief was given Cardiac catheterization done immediately .it relived 80% obstruction. Cardiac surgical resection of tumor performed 6 days later. Acute coronary syndrome as shown from above usually occurs in elderly patients according to the predisposing factors.Mikas obstruction was as a result of a tumor, it was all fixed surgically .The patient was breathing fine (20 breaths per minute, no physical signs of respiratory distress), was not in danger, the air was clear, so there were no reasons for oxygen therapy. In conclusion it is evidently that oxygen therapy has more risks than benefits in patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome; arrhythmias, cell death, sudden cardiac arrest. The breathing/blood circulation is improved by a very small percentage or at times no significant changes in these patients. Most of the guidelines have discouraged its use although they recommend its admission for the first 6 hours. References Wijesinghe, M., Perrin, K., Ranchord, M., (2010) Routine use of oxygen in treatment of myocardial infarction, available heart.bmj.com Thomas, K. John, K. (2014) On Treatment of Myocardial Infarction in Care Unit .The American Journal of Cardiology. Volume (20), pp, 457-464.Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/0002 Jeffery, L. et al. (2016) Guideline on Management of Unstable Angina/Non ST-elevation myocardial infarction. American College of Cardiology Journal. Volume 50(7). Available at www.sciencedirect.com Cabello, JB. et al. (2010) Oxygen therapy for acute myocardial infarction.Sao Paulo Medical .Journal .at https://dx.doi.org/10.1590 Roffi, M,. Patrono, JP (2015) guideline for management of acute coronary syndrome (online) Manoukian, SV,. Feit. F,. (2016) Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome, Journal of The American College of Cardiology pp,738 Bassand, JP., Hamm, CW (2016) Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction, European Soc Cardiology.pg 2136 Davies, MJ,. Woolf, N,. (1997) Pathology Of Acute Myocardial Infarction, British Heart Journal (online) pp, 317 Thygesen, K,. Alpert, JS,. (2017) Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, Journal of The American College cardiology (online) Capes, SE,. Hunt, D,. (2010) Stress hyperglycemia and increased risk of death after myocardial infarction, The Lancet. Maddox, TM,. Wang, L., (2011) Long Term Outcomes after Stent Implantation (online) jamanetwork.com Rioufol, G., Finet, G., (2012) Multiple atherosclerotic plaque rupture in Acute Coronary Syndrome, Circulation .at https://circ.ahajournals.org